Unaspected or Not? Out-of-Sign Aspects, Wide Orbs, the Nodes and Chiron

← Back to Aspects

Whether a planet counts as unaspected depends on the rules you check it against. Change the bodies, the orbs or the kind of aspect, and the same planet in the same chart can pass or fail. This page goes through the cases where that happens, using charts calculated with the free chart's routines for fictional people. The basic definition is on unaspected planets: meaning and definition, and the hand check itself on how to check whether a planet is unaspected.

Calculator note: Astrologist.com does not display an aspect list or label planets as unaspected. The free birth chart draws the five major aspect types between available planets, Lunar Nodes and Chiron, using 8° orbs except 6° for sextiles. The automatic North-South Node opposition is excluded, and no aspect lines are drawn to the chart angles. Conjunction lines can be very short, and Moon lines are omitted when the birth time is unknown. A missing line therefore does not prove that a planet is unaspected. Check the positions and data coverage; near an orb boundary, the displayed whole minutes may be insufficient. Without a birth time, noon positions alone cannot establish unaspected status.

Each case below starts from the same convention. In these guides, a planet is called unaspected when it has no conjunction, sextile, square, trine or opposition to any of the other planets from the Sun through Pluto, either Mean Lunar Node, or Chiron, using Astrologist.com's fixed orbs of 8°, 6°, 8°, 8° and 8° respectively. Each case says how that convention treats it and how another approach might differ.

Contacts only to the Nodes or Chiron

Some astrologers test a planet against the other planets only. Under this guide's convention the Nodes and Chiron are partners too, so the two approaches part ways whenever a planet's only major aspects are to those points.

Tom, Leeds, 5 November 1977, 15:20. Mars at 3°55' Leo makes one major aspect: a square to Chiron at 2°57' Taurus, less than a degree from exact. It has no major aspect to any planet. Counted against the planets alone, this Mars is unaspected. Under this guide's convention it is not, and the wheel draws the Mars-Chiron line.

Eva, Groningen, 5 September 1977, 08:05. Saturn at 23°18' Leo is in trine with the South Node at 16°47' Aries, 126.52° apart, and has no other major aspect. The North Node is 53.48° from Saturn, half a degree short of the sextile window, so only one Node is involved. That is possible because the trine orb (8°) is wider than the sextile orb (6°).

Neither statement contradicts the other. "No aspect to another planet" and "no aspect to any counted partner" are different questions with different answers. In the London sample described on the overview page (51,135 noon charts, one for every date from 1920 to 2059), each planet had major aspects only to the Nodes or Chiron in 0.5% (Pluto) to 2.4% (the Sun) of the 51,135 charts. The meanings of the Nodes and Chiron themselves are on the North Node and South Node and Chiron in astrology.

Near misses and wider orbs

The site's orbs are the boundary for this test. A separation 8.5° from an exact square is no square under these orbs, so that pair has no aspect. It does not make the planet unaspected; only a planet whose every partner misses every window is.

Near misses are common. In Sanne's chart on the how-to page (The Hague, 11 March 1983, 07:40), Venus at 20°06' Aries is unaspected, but it misses a trine to Neptune by 1.00° and an opposition to Pluto by 1.02°. In Tom's chart above, Mars misses a square to Uranus by 0.24°. Across the 51,135 charts of the London sample there were 6,698 cases of an unaspected planet. In 3,533 of them (52.7%) the planet had at least one partner within 1° of an orb window, and in 5,227 (78.0%) within 2°.

Many astrologers use wider orbs than the site's, often extra room for the Sun and Moon. With a 10° orb for trines and oppositions, Sanne's Venus would be in aspect to Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto. Different orbs, applied to the same bodies and aspects, can change the classification. These guides do not add a second orb standard; the 8° and 6° windows stay the rule, and a near miss is worth mentioning as a near miss, not as a hidden aspect. Aspect orbs explains why orbs vary.

Out-of-sign aspects

The calculator measures aspects in degrees and ignores signs, so out-of-sign contacts within orb count.

Daniel, Edinburgh, 21 November 1977, 19:55. The Sun at 29°24' Scorpio and Saturn at 0°11' Virgo are 89.22° apart in the planet table, a square less than a degree from exact, and it is the Sun's only major aspect. Scorpio and Virgo are two signs apart, the relationship normally associated with a sextile, not a square. Under this guide's convention the Sun is aspected. A reader who requires the signs to match the aspect would not call this a square.

Sanne's Venus shows the reverse. Venus in Aries shares the fire element with Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune in Sagittarius, and Pluto is in the opposite sign, Libra. Measured by sign, Venus relates to all four. Measured in degrees, it is 111.00° to 131.00° from the Sagittarius planets and 170.98° from Pluto, outside every window.

Traditions combine these criteria differently. Some give weight to the relationship between the signs, some to the degrees, and some use both, so not every sign-based reader handles out-of-sign contacts the same way. These guides use degrees, because that is what the chart draws, and mention the sign relationship when it differs. Comparing two charts by degree shows the same distinction between two people's charts.

Minor aspects only

The quincunx (150°), semi-sextile (30°), semi-square (45°) and other minor aspects are not part of this test, and the calculator does not detect them. A planet with only minor contacts is unaspected under this convention. Sanne's Venus is 43.23° from Mercury, close to a semi-square, and 33.35° from Chiron, near a semi-sextile, depending on the orb chosen. Some astrologers would say a planet with minor aspects is not truly unaspected. That is a reasonable view under a different definition. The minor aspects guide covers them as an extra layer.

A planet on an angle

Angles are left out of this test, and the wheel draws no aspect lines to them.

Noor, Cardiff, 16 October 1995, 09:10. Venus at 7°29' Scorpio makes no major aspect to any counted partner, so it is unaspected under this convention. Her Ascendant is 7°42' Scorpio, less than a quarter of a degree away. Many astrologers would treat a planet this close to the Ascendant as prominent in the chart, whatever its aspects. Both statements can be true at once: the label describes the planet's aspects, not its overall emphasis. Chart angles explained covers the four angles. Without a birth time there are no angles, so this question does not arise.

Terms that sound similar

• Peregrine. In traditional astrology a peregrine planet has no essential dignity where it sits: it is not in a sign it rules or is exalted in, and does not rule the triplicity, term or face there. That is a test of sign position, not of aspects. Some modern writers also use the word loosely for a planet with few or no aspects, so check how a source defines it before comparing.
• Void-of-course Moon. A timing idea that concerns the Moon making no further major aspect before it leaves its sign. It is mostly used in timing techniques such as electional and horary astrology, and it is separate from this natal test.
• Lilith. Astrologist.com does not calculate Lilith, and it is not counted as a partner here.

Related articles

• Unaspected Sun, Moon and Planets: Meanings by Planet
• Major Aspects in Astrology
• Astrology Aspects Overview
• Generate your free birth chart
• Out-of-Sign Aspects